On 6/5/2011 6:22 PM, Zheng, Debing wrote:
Does anyone have ideas on this: how to add specific license
declaration to source RPM in case source RPM has different license
from the binary RPM?
ehh how can that happen?
(also the license tag is advisory..... not authoritative in any way.
I would suggest adding a significant comment in the spec file clarifying
the actual situation if it's something complex)
Thanks
-Debing
*From:*[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Zheng, Debing
*Sent:* Friday, June 03, 2011 4:01 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* [meego-packaging] One question on license declaration in
.spec file
Hi all,
I have a question on license declaration in .spec file.
I found that I could declare the license for binary rpm and devel rpm.
But I don’t know how to declare source RPM package.
Source RPM package uses the same one with binary RPM.
If anyone could tell me how to declare license for source RPM?
Is this necessary and technical possible?
BRs
-Debing
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-packaging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-packaging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
