On Do, 2011-06-09 at 19:03 +0100, Zhu, Peter J wrote: > Seem we should set a devel project for all these packages as eds since > all the new stuff including eds/syncevolution are now submitted > directly from there. I do see some guys have submissions for the > packages, you don't want them to clob your changes :-). Are you ok?
I had already requested a devel project for EDS (https://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17355) and Anas created the "eds" project for us in response. The intention was to use that for anything related to the EDS migration and potentially future maintenance/testing of related packages. It got a bit confusing during my vacation when we were asked to also put these packages into devel:meego-ux. I'm not sure whether we really want them there. Regarding SyncEvolution, it is now maintained in "eds". Does this answer your question? I'm not entirely sure what you were proposing and whether it differs from what we are doing already ;-} -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ MeeGo-packaging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
