On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 12:10 +0200, [email protected] wrote: > You are expecting decision by whom? Vatula as head of QA or shall we have > consensus as resolution this email thread?
Good point. For me it doesn't really matter. We can also conclude things in QA weekly meeting based on the discussion here. Or for example if there are similar meetings as the one mentioned in the original mail in which several teams meet, these could also be discussed there and then conclude in our public QA meeting. > So Arto - Was this kind of data in your mind (to be communicated with the > decision)? Yes exactly. And thank you for clarifying your proposal! Just to clarify that I don't have that strong opinion as it might seem. The difference in "requirement" field usage was the main reason for which I wanted to raise this discussion, since QA tools work differently at the moment. So that's why it would be important to know if the users of QA tools (including you Jari) would need different functionality. Hopefully others will comment as well. Br, Arto _______________________________________________ MeeGo-qa mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-qa
