Hi Iekku,
Thanks for the response. Jing Wang/Ling Yu/Yanshuang Zheng from Intel will join 
the QA BoF. :)

Thanks
Elva

From: ext-iekku.huttu...@nokia.com [mailto:ext-iekku.huttu...@nokia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 1:34 PM
To: Fu, Elva; meego-qa@lists.meego.com
Subject: RE: [Meego-qa] questions about "Verified" and "Closed" status in 
feature lifecycle

Hi,

If there's not enough time in the QA meeting, we can talk about that in SF 
also. We have QA BoF there:
http://sf2011.meego.com/program/sessions/bof-meego-qa
Still missing people from Intel.

Br,
Iekku

From: meego-qa-boun...@lists.meego.com 
[mailto:meego-qa-boun...@lists.meego.com] On Behalf Of ext Fu, Elva
Sent: 17 May, 2011 03:54
To: Fu, Elva; meego-qa@lists.meego.com
Subject: Re: [Meego-qa] questions about "Verified" and "Closed" status in 
feature lifecycle

How about we discuss a little in next IRC QA meeting? :)

Thanks
Elva

From: meego-qa-boun...@lists.meego.com 
[mailto:meego-qa-boun...@lists.meego.com] On Behalf Of Fu, Elva
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2011 12:16 PM
To: meego-qa@lists.meego.com
Subject: [Meego-qa] questions about "Verified" and "Closed" status in feature 
lifecycle

Hi all,
Seems there are some discrepancy within 
https://meego.com/developers/requirements. In the first picture, "Verified" is 
defined as "No bugs related to this Feature", however in the second picture, if 
"No bugs linked to this feature" the status will be "Closed", so what the 
status will be if no bugs for this feature? :)
"Once a requirement is integrated, MeeGo QA verifies it by running the 
corresponding test cases. Bugs are filed against the requirements and marked 
with a dependency. Eventually, once there are no longer bugs preventing closing 
the feature, it is closed in Featurezilla" is mentioned in this page. but as 
far as I know, if an Open bug is linked to a feature(depend on field), bugzilla 
does not allow people to change status to Verified, so seems QA is unable to 
follow the process to verify and link Open bugs at the same time. According to 
our practice, how about we change the process like that:
*        If the feature meets the intent of the requirement, QA will set status 
to Verified.
*        If the feature Basically meets the intent of the requirement(e.g. 
passed Basic functionality testing and no critical&major bug found), QA will 
set status to Verified. At the same time, QA will add comment to indicate there 
are small bugs(if any) for this feature.
*        QA set status to Reopened if the feature has a lack of functionality 
it was intended to have. QA will file bug and Link the bug to this feature.

Thanks
Elva

_______________________________________________
MeeGo-qa mailing list
MeeGo-qa@lists.meego.com
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-qa

Reply via email to