> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Yang, Lei A
> Sent: 15 June 2011 22:30
> To: Zhou, JieX A; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Meego-qa] [meego-releases] Release 
> EngineeringUpdate on Bug Status Changes
> 
> Firstly, trunk:testing image should not be used to verify 
> bugs. please verify bug on trunk image. 

> Secondly, as far as I know, if a bug is marked as "RELEASED", 
> this means the bug-fixing has been integrated into trunk image. 
> 

Hi Yang Lei, this is the *old* process, at the beginning of the thread
new bug status change was proposed, the proposal is like this:

"The new process is for R.E. to set the status of a bug to 'released'
once the package is in Trunk:Testing and not wait until it has been
promoted to Trunk.

New: Marked as 'resolved' by developer -> submitted to Trunk:Testing ->
accepted by R.E.-> marked as 'released' by R.E once the package is in
Trunk:Testing.

What this means is that QA will focus on Trunk:Testing images and look
for 'released' bugs that have been accepted into Trunk:Testing and
validate that the bug/feature was fixed/implemented before the package
will be promoted to Trunk."

We have some questions about the new change, I collected the questions
raised so far. We expect someone(e.g. proposal makers) kindly clarify:

- Whether we need separately verify the fixed/implemented bug/FEA in
trunk:testing and trunk/weekly image? 
- How we can know that bug fix is in the daily/weekly image, after
verified in trunk:testing?
- Why we make the change?
- What is the benefit of it?


Br,
-Tu


> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Zhou, JieX A
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 1:25 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Meego-qa] [meego-releases] Release Engineering 
> Update on Bug Status Changes
> 
> Hi, there,
> 
> Could anybody pls. response to the questions from Iekku and 
> Qingqing? And also pls. kindly clarified why we make this 
> change and what's the benefit of it.
> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> Jason
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] 
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> > [email protected]
> > Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 4:26 PM
> > To: [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> > [email protected]; [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Meego-qa] [meego-releases] Release 
> Engineering Update on 
> > Bug Status Changes
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Good question. I also wonder how we can separate the verified in 
> > trunk:testing and verified in daily/weekly image. And how 
> we can know 
> > that bug fix is in the daily/weekly image, after verified 
> in trunk:testing.
> > 
> > Br,
> > Iekku
> > 
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: [email protected] [mailto:meego-releases- 
> > >[email protected]] On Behalf Of ext [email protected]
> > >Sent: 13 June, 2011 10:10
> > >To: [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; meego- 
> > >[email protected]; [email protected]
> > >Subject: Re: [meego-releases] [Meego-qa] Release 
> Engineering Update 
> > >on Bug Status Changes
> > >
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >Thanks for the update.
> > >
> > >One question, based on the new process, "trunk: testing" image be 
> > >used to verify the "RELEASED" bug, does the "RELEASED" bug 
> still need 
> > >to be verified again with "trunk" image after the fix is 
> promoted to trunk?
> > >The point is we shall guarantee the fixed/implemented 
> bug/feature is 
> > >also working properly in the trunk image/weekly image but also 
> > >avoiding overlap work.
> > >
> > >Br,
> > >-Tu
> > >________________________________
> > >
> > >   From: [email protected] 
> > >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ulf 
> Hofemeier
> > >   Sent: 11 June 2011 00:27
> > >   To: [email protected]; Collaboration list for Release 
> > >Engineering and QA teams (moderateddiscussion list); 
> > >[email protected] list)
> > >   Subject: [Meego-qa] Release Engineering Update on Bug 
> Status Changes
> > >
> > >
> > >   Hello,
> > >
> > >   Release Engineering and QA have agreed on a proposal that will 
> > >introduce a minor change to the way bug status updates for package 
> > >acceptance into MeeGo repositories will be handled.
> > >
> > >   Previously R.E. set bugs to 'released' only when packages were 
> > >promoted to Trunk. Following up, QA verified that the 
> bug/feature was 
> > >fixed properly and set the bug status to 'verified'.
> > >
> > >   Old: Marked as 'resolved' by developer -> submitted to 
> Trunk:Testing 
> > >-> accepted by R.E. -> promoted to Trunk -> marked as 
> 'released' by 
> > >R.E.
> > >
> > >   The new process is for R.E. to set the status of a bug 
> to 'released' 
> > >once the package is in Trunk:Testing and not wait until it 
> has been 
> > >promoted to Trunk.
> > >
> > >   New: Marked as 'resolved' by developer -> submitted to 
> Trunk:Testing 
> > >-> accepted by R.E.-> marked as 'released' by R.E once the 
> package is 
> > >in Trunk:Testing.
> > >
> > >   What this means is that QA will focus on Trunk:Testing 
> images and 
> > >look for 'released' bugs that have been accepted into 
> Trunk:Testing 
> > >and validate that the bug/feature was fixed/implemented before the 
> > >package will be promoted to Trunk.
> > >
> > >   Thanks,
> > >
> > >   Release Engineering
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >MeeGo-releases mailing list
> > >[email protected]
> > >http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-releases
> > _______________________________________________
> > MeeGo-qa mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-qa
> _______________________________________________
> MeeGo-qa mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-qa
> _______________________________________________
> MeeGo-qa mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-qa
> 
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-qa mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-qa

Reply via email to