Hi Eric et al, nice timing and complete agreement. I've been also thinking about this (role of EM in MeeGo QA, as brought up in the latest MeeGo QA weekly IRC meetings) with similar conclusions.
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 14:26 +0000, eric.le-r...@nokia.com wrote: > In order to accelerate the transition in error management related > activities and make the exercise as graceful as possible, I have > deprecated the wiki > page: http://wiki.meego.com/Quality/Error_Management > I hope it can be removed and I'm adding Mike in CC. I'd prefer a redirect to http://wiki.meego.com/Quality to avoid a 404 for linking from the outside. I can easily set that up if we agree (interpret that as "no disagreement within the next days"). I have moved those two links that were only on the Error Management wikipage to the "Defects tracking" section of the Quality page: http://wiki.meego.com/index.php?title=Quality&action=historysubmit&diff=43696&oldid=43242 > As bugzilla ownership is officially transferred to Shuang from Intel > and the community, as we opened earlier the repositories, I also > wanted to streamline anything related to practices and processes. > > As for the roles, I definitely think that no matter from which > background team members are, Intel, community, other companies, they > can all be united under QA, with related specificities like bugzilla > administration, processes, etc… I was thinking of a "Bugzilla administration" wiki page explaining administration related stuff, e.g. something similar to https://live.gnome.org/BugzillaMaintainers/ . Again, if people agree I can set this up next week when I'm back form holidays... andre -- Andre Klapper (maemo.org bugmaster) http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ | http://www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ MeeGo-qa mailing list MeeGo-qa@lists.meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-qa
