On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:38:53PM +0000, Dr Chris Stevens wrote:
> Dear all,
>     am still playing with this complex dielectric issue. I am running
> two ctl files listed below.  The first, sea_fake.ctl runs in about 75s
> having only real dielectrics ie water with zero conductiivty. The second
> which simulates the same situation but with complex dielectric set by
> using a seawater conductivitty of 4S/m takes over 200000s to run!
> I'm using meep which responds to the meep -V command with:
> 
> Meep 0.10, Copyright (C) 2005 Massachusetts Insitute of Technology.
> Using libctl 3.0.2 and Guile 1.6.7.
> 
> 
> Why is there this huge difference ? I've tried asking for complex fields
> which doesn't make much difference in either case. I'm running for 30000
> as I'm using rather low frequeencies but comapred to their free space
> wavelengths also rather small volumes.

I haven't actually looked at your inputs, but have you checked whether you
are getting NaNs or infinities with the sea water? NaNs slow everything
down dramatically.
--
David Roundy
Dept. of Physics
Oregon State University

_______________________________________________
meep-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss

Reply via email to