Hi Steven,
thanks for your answer.
So I can treat these two results from (harminv (component Ex)
position) as equal and say that the Q from one mode is three times the
other one?
(harminv0:, frequency, imag.freq., Q, |amp|, amplitude, error)
harminv0:, 0.398810428143646, 1.65113746462119e-5, -12076.8390485024,
0.0108854479386194, -0.00326644571009244-0.01038380032779i,
2.44300222652076e-6
harminv0:, 0.396857014202571, -4.64781040806467e-5, 4269.2900458457,
0.917322813922249, 0.564914833787812-0.722739493530499i,
7.30449030154138e-8
Can I also trust the value of Q given by harminv for a field decay
rate in the case when the error is in the order of magnitude e-4 and
the value for imag.freq. in the order of magnitude e-6?
Best regards,
Christine
_______________________________________________
meep-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss
