Dear Steven and all mep user First of all I appreciate so much for Steven 's help about improving my ctl file. But I still have some questions about the result.
I have tried to add calculation of reflection in my code about photonic
crystal. I have changed position of surce higher too. I attach the code. But I
see some problems about the results
* there are extremely high value numbers in reflection and transmission
, 5.85 until 5.29E+04, at 3 lowest frequency, 0, 0.003448, 0.006897
* there are some reflection and transmission which are higher than one,
like 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3
* the value of reflected field is smaller than field in normalization
run. So ther reflection calculation is done by substract normalized run with
reflected field. The result is reasonable enough as reflection spectra. I check
it by two ways, comparing with transmission spectra and add both of them.I want
to know about the physical reason of point 1 and 2 in my result. Is it
physically possible? In previous discussion, Steven says that, transmission
can be larger than one, because it is affected by local density of state of
crystal. Is it the same thing with experiment now? Or, maybe I can just
ignore some impossible values. I hope too that there is someone who can confirm
my method of calculating reflection spectra.
Thank you very much for the guidance
with regard
Andika Asyuda
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
slab2.ctl
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ meep-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss
