Hi,
 
Thank you for your reply.
 
Now I just consider  the single frequency incident wave, which is the simplest 
case. So I think I do not need to do the the fourier transform.
If you like, you can use a tm wave to test my code.
Now I think the probable problem of  the code is some parameters are not 
matched with meep. I am not sure.
I hope you can check the code to help me find the errors.
Thank you.
 
Lei 



 

Hi,

I am sure you have considered this, but I remember from your previous 
posts on this subject that you sampled the electromagnetic field at a 
single time only (300 units, I think in your case).  As far as I 
understand it though, the near-to-far field transform needs to be done 
in the frequency domain so you need to take the accumulated Fourier 
transform across at least one period of the fields and then use this 
value to get the far field.  Apologies if you are already doing this, 
just thought I would make sure.  I am working on a similar ntf code so 
would be interested to know if your approach is the one I should be 
taking.

Regards,

Ian

---------------------------
Research PhD Student
Photonics Group
Dept. of Electrical & Electrical Engineering
University of Bristol
Rm 2.11, Queen's Building
University Walk
Bristol
BS8 1TR

email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




_______________________________________________
meep-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss 
<http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss> 


_______________________________________________
meep-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss

Reply via email to