Dear Dr. Steven and meep users,

Recently, I have met the divergence problem several times. Here is just one
example. In order to get the more accurate transmission of a PC slab, I set
a relatively long run-time, but the field is divergent at about 800
meep-time-step for r=0.25. When r=0.20,  it is also divergent, but when
r=0.28,0.30 or other values, they are not divergent. I think the resolution
40 is enough and the values of the other parameters are also reasonable.
Why is it divergent for some special PC structures? Please give me some
advice.

Thanks!

Best regards,

Deyin

The following is the ctl file:

(define-param n1 3.48)
(define-param eps (* n1 n1))
(define-param r 0.25)
(define-param thick 0.34)
(define-param supercellhight 6)

(set! geometry-lattice (make lattice (size 1 1 supercellhight)));the
computional cell
;(set! eps-averaging? false)
(set! geometry
            (list
                 (make block
                          (center 0 0 -1.0)
                          (size 1 1 thick)
                          (material (make dielectric (epsilon
eps))))
         (make cylinder
                  (center 0 0 -1.0)
                          (radius r)
                          (height thick)
                          (material (make dielectric (epsilon 1))))))
(define-param fcen 0.625) ; pulse center frequency
(define-param df 0.5) ; pulse width (in frequency)

(set! sources
    (list
     (make source
        (src (make gaussian-src (frequency fcen) (fwidth df)))
         (component Ey)
         (center 0 0 1.5)
     (size 1 1 0))))

(set! k-point (vector3 0 0 0))
(set! pml-layers (list (make pml (direction Z) (thickness 1.0))))
(set-param! resolution 40)

(define (Eoutput)
         (print "Eoutput, " (meep-time) ", "
         (get-field-point Ey (vector3 0 0 1.0)) ", "
        (get-field-point Ey (vector3 0 0 -1.8)) "\n"))

(run-until 1638.4  Eoutput)
_______________________________________________
meep-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss

Reply via email to