Yes, load-minus flux is from a simulation with exactly the same grid
size and flux-plane size.
The boundary conditions don't change in the scatterer run (k-point is
set to the same vector, and there is no different call to
meep-fields-set-boundary).
What does change is that in the scatterer run a block of metal is placed
on top of one of the lattice boundaries.
Best,
Matt
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Steven G. Johnson wrote:
On Jun 10, 2009, at 8:33 AM, matt wrote:
When this happens however, the load-minus-flux fails with the following
error:
meep: incorrect dataset size (48000 vs. 96000) in load_dft_hdf5
./test2-refl-flux_noscat_sim_0deg_75res_Hz.h5:ez_dft
load-minus-flux has to be from a simulation with exactly the same grid size
and flux-plane size. Did you change any of these details between your two
calculations? Did you change the boundary conditions?
_______________________________________________
meep-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss
_______________________________________________
meep-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss
