Hi, how would you describe the difference observed? Or, could you please upload the time-domain data from the simulation? F.
One tip: I have always set the PMLs using one command, so I would believe that the X and Y PMLs could be overwritten by the Z PMLs. 2012/9/4, huang bo <[email protected]>: > hi! everybody > when using meep, I fount a problem > > when I seting the PML absorbing boundary, I found a problem, when setting > whth the below lines > > (set! pml-layers (list (make pml (direction X) (thickness pmlthick)))) > (set! pml-layers (list (make pml (direction Y) (thickness pmlthick)))) > (set! pml-layers (list (make pml (direction Z) (thickness pmlthick)))) > > the simulation result is different with the below lines > (set! pml-layers (list (make pml (thickness pmlthick)))) > > According the reference of MEEP, Default is putting PML layers on the > boundaries in all directions. > > can anyone can explain this > > Thank !! > _______________________________________________ meep-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss
