Dear Thomas and all,
I wrote most of my thoughts on the referred page; while sometimes the
discrete Lorentzian oscillators suffice to precisely describe the
dielectric function in the frequency range of interest, the optical
spectra of semiconductors are usually of the harder cases.

You can manually fit the eps' and eps'' spectrum by summing more
narrower oscillators. This takes human time, and each oscillator also
requires CPU time in each FDTD step, so it is always a tradeoff.

The good point is that if you are interested in photovoltaics, your
simulations may be perhaps restricted to the wavelengths of 1200--400
nm, where silicon seems to behave in a relatively cultivated way.

DominecF


2014-05-19 18:15 GMT+02:00, Thomas LOPEZ <thomas.lo...@isae.fr>:
> Dear Meep users,
>
> I would like to implement in MEEP  this  model  of Silicon permittivity
> (see below, from Deinega, A. & John, S. *Effective optical response of
> silicon to sunlight in the finite-difference time-domain method*.
> /Optics letters/ *37,* 112--114 (2012)):
>
> This expression is from multiple Debye, Drude and Lorentz terms and is
> sufficient to describe the response of bulk silicon to 300nm to 1000nm...
> I found some information about modeling Silicon here
> http://fzu.cz/~dominecf/misc/eps/ and also in Meep tutorial.
> Unfortunately, the imaginary part of epsilon is often far from tabulated
> data.
>
> So do you have any idea how to implement this expression? Are there any
> "tricks" using polarization class?
>
> Many thanks in advance for your assistance.
>
>
> --
> Thomas Lopez
> Doctorant/PhD Student
> Département Electronique Optronique et Signal (DEOS)
> Institut Supérieur de l'Aeronautique et de l'Espace (ISAE)
> 10 Avenue Edouard Belin BP 54032
> 31055 Toulouse CEDEX 4 FRANCE
> www.isae.fr
>
>

_______________________________________________
meep-discuss mailing list
meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu
http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss

Reply via email to