> On Jul 25, 2017, at 10:31 AM, Heligman, Daniel M.
> <heligma...@buckeyemail.osu.edu> wrote:
>
> The way I am subtracting it is by taking the raw field on the reflection side
> of the computational cell and cutting out the portion of the signal that
> contains the incident pulse.
This is easy to get wrong. Generally, I recommend running two simulations —
one with the scatterer and one without, and subtracting the latter fields from
the former before Fourier transforming in order to get the scattered/reflected
flux, similar to what is done in the Meep tutorial.
(Why not just use the built-in dft-flux feature for this, as in the Meep
tutorial?)
_______________________________________________
meep-discuss mailing list
meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu
http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss
