Hi Chris,

Thanks for letting us know, and thanks for the good work on Pycon AU.

Regards,

Javier

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Christopher Neugebauer
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10 April 2015 at 00:39, Javier Candeira <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Thanks, Chris.
>>
>> If Pycon AU adopts the LA code of conduct, that would make me (I speak
>> personally) want MPUG to adopt it too. And many of the other reasons for it
>> (MPUG organisers and presenters are also involved with Pycon, so their
>> acceptance of the CoC is a given in many cases) would stand too. Let's say
>> that we'd be adopting the Pycon AU CoC by reference, not by value.
>>
>> Note that it's my opinion that a small user group has different dynamics
>> than a big conference, so the language itself did not bother me much. I
>> think the signaling aspect of having a CoC at all and the commitment of the
>> organisers to take issues seriusly is much more important than the wording
>> of the CoC. Having said that, it's always better to adopt a well-maintained
>> document.
>>
>> For the reasons above I'm going to suggest on the MPUG list that we adopt
>> the LA CoC too, "since it's the one used by Pycon AU". When do you
>> expect/hope the Pycon AU organisation to make the decision to switch?
>>
>
> Sorry for the delay,
>
> PyCon AU has adopted the LA code of conduct for 2015:
> https://2015.pycon-au.org/register/code_of_conduct
>
> --Chris
>
>
> --
> --Christopher Neugebauer
>
> Jabber: [email protected] -- IRC: chrisjrn on irc.freenode.net --
> WWW: http://chrisjrn.com -- Twitter: @chrisjrn
_______________________________________________
melbourne-pug mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug

Reply via email to