> I would like to know what to do with all the patches I sent for review,
I think they're all good to go unless you've heard any explicit dissent. (i.e. the split filtertext message :)) > I have other patches to send but some of them depend on the > previous batch. For example preliminary plugins for: prcs, arx, > svk & fossil, perforce & patch file. (for which I have a test setup) Excellent, though I'd like to see some testing before these go in as we're so close to a release. The one exception is I'd love to see patch support and volunteer myself for testing. I'm sure there are more people who'd be interested too. > I have cleanups & factorizations in VC, filename-based VC plugins, > fixes for current VC plugins wrt diffing multiple files & launching diff > on the repo root, migration to subprocess everywhere (with > factorization of lots of code), diff only modified files, cleanups, the > VC unittest work... > Do you want to make a release before all of that happen ? Yes, I'd be wary of sweeping changes, especially as it has been so brittle in the past. Stephen. _______________________________________________ meld-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/meld-list
