Can someone unsubscribe me, please?

I used the web interface to unsubscribe, and it said it did unsub me,
but I keep getting these.

Thanks
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Automatic 3 way merge for conflicts
From: Piotr Piastucki <[email protected]>
To: Kai Willadsen <[email protected]>
CC: meld-list <[email protected]>
Date: 12/18/2012 04:06 PM
> On 12/18/2012 08:13 PM, Kai Willadsen wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, but I'm pretty opposed to opening auto-merge by default for
>> conflicts. What I expect to see when I open a conflict is MERGED, not
>> BASE, and we can't guarantee that the result of our merge will be
>> anything like MERGED.
> Since the auto-merge code does similar job to most VCSs when
> it comes to merging 2 files with common ancestor the result
> should be pretty much the same as MERGED.
> Personally, I do not really care if the result of the merge presented
> by the UI is exactly the same as MERGED as long as the result is
> reasonable
> and the UI allows me to resolve the conflicts easily.
> TortoiseSVN opens conflict solver automatically for conflicts and I
> must admit it is a quite useful feature. But it's just my opinion :)
>
>> As an aside (that's even more work), it would be extra awesome to
>> support diff3-style conflict markers, so that when we get conflicts,
>> we don't show the useless left/right conflict portions, but show the
>> ancestor portion of the file in that position.
>>
>>
> Well, that's exactly what auto-merge does.
> I am afraid that trying to parse markers in MERGED and replacing
> conflicts with proper chunks from BASE instead might lead to some
> errors as it is not always obvious which chunk to use.
>
> Cheers,
> Piotr
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> meld-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/meld-list

_______________________________________________
meld-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/meld-list

Reply via email to