Ditto!!!!

        Teri Shoemaker
        
                -----Original Message-----
                From:   Sue Rossi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
                Sent:   Tuesday, August 29, 2000 6:05 PM
                To:     'Rhonda McFarlane'; 'John Morris'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                Cc:     [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nancy Hussmann
                Subject:        RE: [CSMFO Members] Bereavement Leave

                I fear we bean counters play too much by the books.
Bereavement leave
                should be there for the emotional well being of the
employee.  We don't need
                a test of whether the fetus is viable or not.  It doesn't
matter.  The
                employee matters.  Who cares what the IRS or the State
thinks?  Employees
                aren't going to "abuse the privilege".

                -- Sue Rossi

                -----Original Message-----
                From: Rhonda McFarlane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
                Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 11:30 AM
                To: 'John Morris'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Nancy
                Hussmann
                Subject: RE: [CSMFO Members] Bereavement Leave


                To John Morris et. el.:
                I feel compelled to weigh in on this sensitive issue.  My
husband is a
                funeral director and for that reason I am familiar with
state law on what
                constitutes a death.  The State of California requires a
death certificate
                if gestation is beyond 20 weeks.  To be consistent with
state law I would
                recommend that the bereavement leave be allowed up when the
miscarriage
                event is beyond 20 weeks.

                Rhonda McFarlane
                Chief Financial Officer
                South Tahoe Public Utility District


                -----Original Message-----
                From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
                Of John Morris
                Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 9:38 AM
                To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                Subject: [CSMFO Members] Bereavement Leave


                I had 19 responses to the question concerning using
bereavement leave
                in the event of a miscarriage. The overwhelming response was
that the
                issue has never come up. However, the results are:

                6  Would allow sick leave.

                12 Would allow it to be considered bereavement leave.

                1  Said the issue had come up and did not allow it to be
                bereavement.

                Also, no one thought the trimester issue was important.

                I think if I remember my Federal Income Tax course
correctly. The IRS
                policy is that a live birth regardless of time alive is
considered to
                be viable and the parents can take the deduction for the
dependent for
                that year. Still births are not deductible.
                

Reply via email to