Dear Mickaël,
many thanks for reaching out and also many thanks for this article.
I second what you state and formulate in this text. There are very
strong statements, especially the quotes below.
If the others agree, we could reference this in our blog. I believe this
is important and we should even consider to forward this to relevant
persons. One of our members already stepped ahead:
https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/pull/1563
(Mickaël, I assume you are okay with this?)
Best regards,
Eddie
_________
* "The concern isn't about protecting illegal content, it's about
protecting democratic discourse. Private conversations could become
subject to monitoring based on shifting political definitions of harmful
speech. What begins as child protection infrastructure could evolve into
a tool for suppressing political opposition or monitoring dissenting
opinions in private communications."
* "The programmed death of European alternatives. This regulation
creates a structural disadvantage for European communication services
trying to build alternatives to US tech giants."
* "The October 14th vote represents more than a policy choice about
child protection. It's a decision about whether Europe will cripple its
own communication infrastructure in pursuit of surveillance capabilities
that won't work as promised."
On 22/09/2025 15:45, Mickaël Rémond wrote:
Hello,
I tried to make a technical argument here:
https://www.process-one.net/blog/chat-control-2025/
Feel free to send me your feedback if you find any mistake or inaccuracy.
Thanks !
