Thx for the clarification. My feeling is the JABBER trademark is mainly
used *orally* - but that a lot, still after so many years.
On 3/8/26 2:26 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 3/8/26 12:46 AM, Dan Caseley wrote:
I read this as "Don't bother licensing the Jabber trademark" since
we're not really using it.
Correct.
Existing license-holders would continue to have permission to use the
JABBER mark (I believe - we'll have to check this with lawyers), but new
applicants would need to talk with Cisco directly instead of working
through the XSF or a successor organization.
Peter
