that seam very strange... I've been the turbo boxes are stronger due to
thicker gears and hence more teeth contact
----- Original Message -----
From: Pete & Kath Liebig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 10:29 PM
Subject: RE: gearbox ratios.
> Chris,
>
> Yes, I can confirm this - I've had both and the only difference was a
higher
> fifth for the turbo.
>
> PL
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of cp
> Sent: Sunday, 6 August 2000 19:20
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: gearbox ratios.
>
> thanks
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Errol Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2000 7:37 PM
> Subject: Re: gearbox ratios.
>
>
> > Chris,
> > >From the S14 manual those DET ratios are correct. The NA ratios are
also
> > correct for the later 71C boxes. I believe some early NA's ran a 2.01
> > second instead of the 1.902 ratio.
> > Cheers
> > Feral Errol
> >
> > ----------
> > From: cp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: gearbox ratios.
> > Date: Sunday, August 06, 2000 6:38
> >
> > Do the sr20de and sr20det gearboxes have very similar ratios?
> >
> > the list I've got here says they do but it doesn't seam right to
> me..unless
> > I have listed them wrong.
> >
> > http://members.optushome.com.au/amaxeng/five10/gearbox.htm
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
