gEE WHIZZ  the 400LX stuff is about 8-10 years old ,
400LX is nothing like LX.
400LX  is under STX today,it's even worse than Alivo

Malcolm

Luke Clough wrote:
> 
> I do, anything less and I tend to brake it. I out grew my original 400LX cranks
> (they were too soft) upgraded to XT - no more problems.
> 
> Luke Clough
> 
> Chris Halpin wrote:
> 
> > Malcom, who needs XT when you can get LX with with the numbers 510 on them?
> >
> > PS - I am willing to give up my time and for a small fee, write 510 on any
> > components you like!!
> > chris
> >
> > >From: MALDAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >To: ozdat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Subject: must get
> > >Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 18:30:26 +1200
> > >
> > >
> > >Short note,
> > >
> > >If anyone's looking to buy a MTB cycle,Or is thinking of buying a new
> > >one.
> > >
> > >It must have Shimano LX parts as the new base numbers are FC-510.
> > >
> > >
> > >It must be the best stuff they have ever made.
> > >
> > >Malcolm
> 

--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List   Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send  submissions to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to