Steve,
You were a lot luckier than me, my Sports Sedan had an adjustable rear bar.
Position 0 (looks setting) was the only place that didn't turn it into a
tail happy dog. I found the worst thing with the rear bar was under brakes,
it just wanted to pirouette, resulted in poor corner entry speed and even
worse exit speed. The bar that I had was also supposed to be the better of
the two types available that mounted rearward of the diff, very similar to
the bar on the Koch car, and I noticed that it was set on P 0 last time I
saw it too.
regards
Terry
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of steve taylor
Sent: Tuesday, 29 May 2001 9:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: rear sway bar on 510
Justin,
I say go for it!! I too have Kmac gear front and back. 24mm front and 18mm
rear.
I noticed a huge difference even in street driving after i put the rear bar
on,
its hard to explain but the rear end just feels a shitload tighter....
As for use on the track ive raced mine twice on circuits and the rear end
has
behaved quite well and pretty predictably, no excessive oversteer or
anything to
worry about.
Its all good as far as i can see!
Steve.
Justin Friedrichs wrote:
> Hi List,
> I have a KMAC rear sway bar sitting in my shed with a 510 I
recently
> bought. Should I put it on? I know some people do/do not agree with them
on
> an IRS car, but they work on the front struts which are independent. At
some
> stage I may use it as a track car, but mostly on the roads. Any wisdom on
> this issue?
> Thanks again
> Justin
--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
