The C110 rear end setup is the same as 510 but bigger, gas shocks eye at top,, pin at bottom if I remember right,R180 3.5 diff..
Malcolm ----- Original Message ----- From: "GREENBURY, Andrew Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:51 AM Subject: Re: 240K/C210 Skyline differences... > Mal and Terry, > > Thanks for the descriptions - in that case I believe all the cars I looked > at at the 2 local wreckers were C210 :( > > Did the 240K/C110 have rear coilover suspension, or separate coil and > damper like the 1600? > > Thanks > Andrew > > On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Maldat wrote: > > > The 240KGT/GL ,,GTX skyline C110 is very much the same car,different > > badges,,even the same paint colours. > > > > C110 is very much the same as 510 front and rear. > > C110 and C210 all have round twin Skyline tail lights.apart from the Jap > > market C210 that has square,just like the 240K thats not a 240 but a 180 > > C110 and they have square tails too. > > > > Now my 1973 C110 240KGL "Skyline" has a far better trim level and dash trim > > than a C110 1976 GTX Skyline that came from Japan and sold here as new. > > Mine was sold new in Japan then went to ozzie then came to NZ.(it still has > > the ozzie rego sticker on the screen 1974)first regoed in NZ in 1975 as used > > import. > > malcolm > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Terry Rudd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 8:51 PM > > Subject: RE: 240K/C210 Skyline differences... > > > > > > > Andrew, > > > > > > Aussie only got the 240K type C110 and all of our local C210's were > > > Skylines. 240K has round tail lights with small stop lights in the centre, > > > C210 has rectangular tail lights. > > > > > > Pictures of both here (not Aussie models so a bit different, but the body > > is > > > much the same) > > > > > > http://www.datsunworld.com/c110/c110.htm > > > http://www.datsunworld.com/c210/c210.htm > > > > > > > > > regards > > > Terry > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of GREENBURY, > > > Andrew Robert > > > Sent: Saturday, 1 February 2003 6:47 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: 240K/C210 Sykline differences... > > > > > > > > > Hi List, > > > > > > I went to the local pick a part to grab some 240K rear springs to try out > > > as had been discussed recently. But how can you tell the difference > > > between 240Ks and C210 skylines when badging and compliance plates etc > > > have been removed?? All the potential wrecks today had coil over rear > > > springs - did both the 240K and C210 have this, or was one the same rear > > > coil style as the 1600/180b? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --membersozdat------------------------------------------------------- OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:- Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] No unauthorised redistribution of this email http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------
