hi, as far  as i know  they are the same,. i dont think it`ll make a
differance, which one u use,. i havent heard  of a cam gear breaking ,
etc...the one on the left looks a bit beefier...

mark k


---------------------------------------------------------------------
"Are you still wasting your time with spam?...
There is a solution!"

Protected by GIANT Company's Spam Inspector
The most powerful anti-spam software available.
http://mail.spaminspector.com


----- Original Message -----
From: "Zac Campbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 1:44 PM
Subject: L cam gears


> OK lads, whats the difference between these two L-cam gears? (apart from
> the one on the right looking heaps sik-er).
> The gear on the left weighs ~740g and is standard L-4 issue. The one on
> the right weighs around 540g and I believe comes from L28.
>
> http://members.iinet.net.au/~zac510/camgears.jpg
>
> I imagine the swiss cheese one is the gear of choice.
>
> cheers!
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.2 - Release Date: 21/04/2005
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.2 - Release Date: 21/04/2005
>
>
>
>





-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.2 - Release Date: 21/04/2005

--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List   Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send  submissions to  [email protected]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.2 - Release Date: 21/04/2005

Reply via email to