On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Dustin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The first search result I found *implied* they were talking about a > ``get [something] set'' sequence isn't atomic. > > Are there particular places you're looking? > > If people believe this, we should work to correct them.
"And since memcached operations are not atomic..." http://highscalability.com/strategy-break-memcache-dog-pile "Memcache doesn't have locks. Memcache is not atomic." http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/01/28/memcache-keeping-data-in-the-handiest-place-memory Yeah, other search results are probably about get+set sequence, so seems that i have somewhat exaggerated confusion about memcache atomicity, sorry. Still, i think this simple question should be in memcached faq. -- С уважением, Кевац Марко Sincerely yours, Kevac Marko
