not really, i write this for you can use memcached without any net io if you do not need supposed to be distributed cache (you do not have many data > your memory)
On 10月27日, 下午8时44分, "Boris Partensky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry.. Doesn't this sort of defeat the purpose of memcache? It was written > as and it is supposed to be distributed cache. > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 6:08 AM, shineyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > hi, all: > > > i write a project about memcached named embed memcached > > > if you want a memcached work with a local process, without any net > > communication to save some performance about socket, memcached string > > command process, embed-memcached is your best choice! > > -- > --Boris
