Crazy? No. Though I understand, from someone who has been to the PDC this week, that such a thing is probably in Cache Extensions (see his writeup here<http://amundsen.com/blog/archives/880> )
The big hurdle that you may overcome is how you'll name items without collision if you just extended the classes. But I'd be interested in hearing more about it if someone tries. Josef On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:56 AM, TheJonathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Has anyone played around with extending the Sql data classes in .NET > to add a layer of memcached? The datasets could be stored in > memcached, and it would just need some fancy coding to make the > updates/inserts invalid the proper keys. Am I crazy for even thinking > about such a thing? :) -- "If you see a whole thing - it seems that it's always beautiful. Planets, lives... But up close a world's all dirt and rocks. And day to day, life's a hard job, you get tired, you lose the pattern." Ursula K. Le Guin http://www.finsel.com/words,-words,-words.aspx (My blog) - http://www.finsel.com/photo-gallery.aspx (My Photogallery) - http://www.reluctantdba.com/dbas-and-programmers/blog.aspx (My Professional Blog)
