I didn't mean anything negative by my post. Please don't take offense.
It was more about confirming the license details in my own head.
On Dec 13, 2008, at 2:53 PM, Todd Berman <[email protected]> wrote:
And even if it was GPL licensed
1) They aren't distributing their version of memcached, so there is no
requirement for them to be sharing anything
2) And, even if they were distributing their work, they aren't
required to merge their patches anywhere, just publish them. Go look
at sony's website, you will find all sorts of interesting patches to
the kernel to make it work properly on their TVs and things like that
(http://products.sel.sony.com/opensource/), which is less than
facebook just did.
--Todd
On Dec 12, 4:27 pm, mike <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Dustin <[email protected]> wrote:
If anyone at facebook is listening, is it possible at all to add
this work onto the codebase where everyone else has been working?
+1
not to mention couldn't that technically be required in the
GPL/whatever license memcached is under?
