> On Jan 25, 11:04 am, carlb wrote: > > > without leaving memcached exposed to the outside Internet. All of the > > documentation lists -l with only one interface specified - is it > > possible to list two? >
Dustin wrote: > If your goal is enhance security, you're better off keeping the > packets from getting to the network interface in the first place or at > least doing filtering *on* the host (or both). > > Binding to multiple addresses will lead to confusing node location > (i.e. figuring out which server owns a particular key). You're not > going to configure each address for each node are you? As far as I know, the question of which server owns a particular key does not arise unless there are multiple memcached servers in the configuration. One central memcached server only on one machine which has access to both LAN's wouldn't encounter that specific issue?
