Interesting... have you tested it with multiple clients? Do you think there's any reason to believe that more clients would cause degradation?
Have you considered making this an option? I'm assuming the most common response to this will be "Memcached works very well for what it was designed. Don't mess with that." Mike. On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Josh Dybnis <[email protected]> wrote: > > memcached-prefix is an experimental fork off of the memcached 1.3 > development branch. It adds commands pget and pdelete that operate on > ranges of keys having a common prefix. The new commands can be used as > a simple namespace mechanism. It also adds a memcachedb compatible > rget command. > > Performance is very close to the standard memcached (see the > benchmarks on the project page). Space usage is also roughly > unchanged. > > Project page: http://jdybnis.github.com/memcached/ > > >
