On Apr 29, 7:01 am, kk kailasam <[email protected]> wrote: > I see a pretty nice writeup about memcached [1]. Have those changes merged > with the latest 'official' version of memcached?
That's a fork from a fairly old version of memcached. It's not mergeable, though most of the generally useful parts have been there for a while. Is there a particular bottleneck you're experiencing that you don't feel we've solved as of a 1.3 beta?
