My understanding of the current software is that an individual memory bucket will grow in size as needed as long as there is free memory, but that growth of one memory bucket cannot cause another bucket to evict data.
So is it possible that the cache is partially filled by another memory bucket that has data with no expiration? On May 14, 9:38 am, Dustin <[email protected]> wrote: > On May 14, 2:37 am, TopLess <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Colin, > > > thx for your answer. > > This is our configuration : > > # memory > > -m 10000 > > > In fact, each server had 16 GB and only 3 GB is reserved by system, so > > there is no problem concerning the free memory. > > So we don't reach max memory usage, but memcached items stays strictly > > constant. > > An idea ? > > That does seem odd. The output of "stats" and "stats items" and > "stats slabs" would help. > > What expiration are you setting for these items? What version of > memcached (stats will include that).
