Thanks Les, Brian .. I will surely try what you have suggested, thanks again all for all your help. I would have been more pleased had we discussed even remotely about memcached tuning, which we didn't. I guess, someone here must have done and would be pleased to share it.
- V On Jun 1, 8:51 am, Brian Moon <[email protected]> wrote: > > "If your file based approach works.." cuz I don't want to stop working > > on optimization just because something works, and as you have > > mentioned about fine tuning memcached I still have not been able to > > achieve that, how can I say FS approach works better for me. > > Its not a question of whether or not memcached *could* be faster. The > question you should be asking when optimiziing is "What is the > bottleneck in my application?" If it is the file based cache, you need > to fix it. But, if its not, why focus on that? > > As for your issues, if you only have one web server, memcached is not > the right tool here and you are wasting your time. You use PHP, use APC > or xcache if you want a memory based cache for PHP on a single web > server. If you have more than one web server, you need to be performing > your tests using more than one web server. > > Brian.
