If you're talking about static files, it would be slower than your apache is now. Your OS should be caching files in RAM, which is much faster than going through memcached to get them.
- Perrin On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:39 AM, googleuser<[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > I have some problems with apache. > If I use squid as proxy-cache I have auth problems. And if I use > mod_cache do not work because mod_cache uses rewrited url and not > requested url (all pages are the same for mod_cache). > > These problems are hitting me to implement new http caching engine. > I think that memcached could be useful for this. > Anyone have some experience or info about memcached as http cache > engine. Performance, memory issues, posible implementations,...? >
