On Aug 20, 12:19 pm, Mark Atwood <[email protected]> wrote:
> Also discussed is eliminating the "even/odd" release numbering system.

  I don't have a huge opinion here.  I just want it to be obvious
which releases are newer than others (feature-wise).

> I propose instead that we keep the main tree usable and stable and  
> passing all tests at all times (like Drizzle does), and development  
> and expermental features be in their own independent branches, and  
> they get merged into the main branch as they stablize.

  We work really hard to ensure that master is always well-tested
code.  We don't push code there that doesn't build on all of our first-
class supported builders (having some problems with OpenBSD, but that
is hopefully to be first-class soon).

Reply via email to