On Sep 10, 6:31 am, Dean Michael Berris <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Is this by design? Should I file for a feature request for an
> incr/decr that also updates the expiration of a cache key?

  It's particularly difficult to change the expected behavior here.
In general, the best thing to do typically is to just set the
expiration of the counter to 0 and let it fall off on its own.

Reply via email to