-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
For security issue, many servers are KVM virtual machine running in our server farm, and memcached works pretty well in them for us. But I have no idea when it work with AWS. We use memcached for data sharing and passing. for example, PHP gets client's request, put client's POST data in memcached, call perl gearman worker with the key as param, worker get the POST data from memcached, do it's job, put results to memcached, return a key, then PHP gets the result from memcached and generate new page for client. We do this for reducing gearman's data-passing overhead. Best wishes, BlueT. Jim Barcelona wrote: > Hi, memcached performs pretty much the same on a virtual machine (AWS EC2) > as it does on physical machine. > > At McCann.com (where I contract), memcache is used to maintain a list of > servers and the number of posts in different forums. > > I haven't really pushed memcache hard enough to see if it would perform > differently on a virtual machine vs. physical machine. > > Has anybody noted any differences? > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 07:26:31PM -0700, Anthony Vierra wrote: >> I searched the group for messages related to AWS & simpleDB. Didn't >> see any. >> >> Our project is in Java, and we are planning to deploy on AWS as a >> cache for SimpleDB. >> >> Anyone else in this boat, and already rowing? Would love to share some >> ideas. >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkq8cjgACgkQfoJ/q1KWx6ju1ACgg1wBVvOnaSs1r9P2dnIRPnEn CHAAn2EG0jpQ2U2PLevQ63kJAa7OSX0f =siSV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
