Which version did you compile, and did you have to do anything special to get it to work?
/Henrik On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 20:29, Jeff <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have compiled a 64 bit version of memcached, and am running with 6 GB > caches on 64 bit Windows servers. It works very well. > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Henrik Schröder <[email protected]>wrote: > >> The standard process memory limit on all 32-bit versions of windows is >> 2GB. This usually doesn't matter, since you can't use more than around 3GB >> of memory as long as you run a 32-bit OS. >> >> If you're running a 64-bit version of Windows, and want to use more than >> 2GB per memcached instance, you also need a 64-bit version of the memcached >> server. I've never tried recompiling it with 64-bit support, it's quite >> possible that it will just work. If you run the 32-bit version of the >> memcached server on 64-bit windows, you're probably still limited to 2GB or >> so. >> >> Not that any of this is something you really need to worry about anyway. >> Just run more instances - problem solved. >> >> >> /Henrik >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 14:21, Adi <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi, >>> I heard that Windows 2003 on 32 Bit Operating System only supports 2Gb >>> of memory per "Memcached instance"? I just want to know how much >>> memroy can be utilize in windows 2003 64Bit? what is the limit of >>> memory sizes with respect windows 2003 32 OR 64 Bit operating system? >>> >>> Thanks >> >> >> >
