I am using version 1.2.1, and I did not need to change anything to get it to compile under 64 bits..
Though I just saw that Patrick Galbraith has gotten a more recent version to compile under Windows, so that's probably more interesting. On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Henrik Schröder <[email protected]> wrote: > Which version did you compile, and did you have to do anything special to > get it to work? > > > /Henrik > > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 20:29, Jeff <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have compiled a 64 bit version of memcached, and am running with 6 GB >> caches on 64 bit Windows servers. It works very well. >> >> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Henrik Schröder <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> The standard process memory limit on all 32-bit versions of windows is >>> 2GB. This usually doesn't matter, since you can't use more than around 3GB >>> of memory as long as you run a 32-bit OS. >>> >>> If you're running a 64-bit version of Windows, and want to use more than >>> 2GB per memcached instance, you also need a 64-bit version of the memcached >>> server. I've never tried recompiling it with 64-bit support, it's quite >>> possible that it will just work. If you run the 32-bit version of the >>> memcached server on 64-bit windows, you're probably still limited to 2GB or >>> so. >>> >>> Not that any of this is something you really need to worry about anyway. >>> Just run more instances - problem solved. >>> >>> >>> /Henrik >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 14:21, Adi <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> I heard that Windows 2003 on 32 Bit Operating System only supports 2Gb >>>> of memory per "Memcached instance"? I just want to know how much >>>> memroy can be utilize in windows 2003 64Bit? what is the limit of >>>> memory sizes with respect windows 2003 32 OR 64 Bit operating system? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> >> >
