Hi Christian, On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Christian Becker <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi Martin, > > thanks for your reply :) > > I found the website of your company and after reading your references, now > i am really confident that the session manager would be able to handle our > load :) > Great to hear that (it makes me really glad I have to admit :)) > > Now the only thing left to do is the persuasion of our development team, > since they have the position, that this kind of session sharing is > impossible. > What are their arguments/concerns? Cheers, Martin > > thanks again, > christian > > 2009/10/27 Martin Grotzke <[email protected]> > > Hi Christian, >> >> I created the memcached-session-manager (msm) for the relaunch of one of >> the biggest sites in germany, therefore it's designed to be performant and >> scalable :) (the relaunch is still under development). We're just in the >> process of integrating msm in other projects as well, as session failover is >> often not fully covered. >> >> However, some users should already be using it, according to the issue >> tracker and the mailing list (and some email conversations I had with >> others). >> >> Concerning performance and stability: as the memcached-session-manager >> itself does no resource intensive processing itself, performance and >> stability mainly depends on memcached and spymemcached (which is used for >> communication with memcached). Both are proven technologies which are used >> in production. >> >> In terms of performance it's interesting to consider, that session backup >> can be done asynchronously, so that your requests/responses do not have to >> wait until the session is sent to memcached (by default, the backup is done >> synchronously). If sessions are sent to memcached synchronously, you can >> specify the timeout for this. I just added these things (* >> sessionBackupAsync, sessionBackupTimeout) to the documentation, was still >> on my list, see >> http://code.google.com/p/memcached-session-manager/wiki/SetupAndConfiguration >> * >> * >> * >> *Cheers, >> Martin* >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Christian Becker <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi Martin, >>> >>> this looks really great. Since we also use tomcat for our platform, we >>> would like to use it. >>> >>> But, can you please tell me a reference where you already use it? >>> It would be great if you can tell me a bit about the performance and >>> stability. >>> >>> thank you, >>> cheers, >>> Christian >>> >>> On 25 Okt., 01:38, "martin.grotzke" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > I just release memcached-session-manager 1.0: >>> http://code.google.com/p/memcached-session-manager/ >>> > >>> > It's a session failover solution for tomcat, sending sessions to >>> > memcached after a request is finished, so that this session can be >>> > picked up by other tomcats if one tomcat fails. >>> > >>> > It would be great if the memcached-session-manager could be listed in >>> > the wiki on the page for related projects: >>> http://code.google.com/p/memcached/wiki/MemcachedOffspring >>> > >>> > Any other feedback is also welcome of course :) >>> > >>> > Thanx && cheers, >>> > Martin >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Martin Grotzke >> http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/ >> > > -- Martin Grotzke http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
