Hi Matt ,thanks for your reply!
Actually, my situation is something like "data recovery", before I save the
data into database, I executed "flush_all" command, and now I need to get
the data of the memory and push them into database. As the ref says,  "The
most precise definition of what flush_all does is the following: it causes
all items whose update time is earlier than the time at which flush_all was
set to be executed to be ignored for retrieval purposes." . The memcached
just ignored the get request  for the data that have been flushed, according
to the update time, but the data remains intact in memory, besides to gcore
the memcached process image, is there any other way such as change os time
or something to recovery the data from memory ?

2009/12/22 Matt Ingenthron <[email protected]>

> Stephen wrote:
>
>> Hi, everyone:
>>     In my project, I execute the "flush_all" command with careless,
>> however, the data in the memcache is important for me, it has not to
>> be saved into database.
>>    And I read the doc, it says " flush_all doesn't actually free all
>> the memory taken up by existing items; that will happen gradually as
>> new items are stored." Since the memcache just use a half of the
>> memory allocated, I think the data which are not saved into database
>> may be still in the MEMORY, so is there anyone tell me how I could get
>> the data ?
>>
>>
>
> There is no method of doing so designed for users, but there are a couple
> of things underneath.  It sounds like you're in a "data recovery" type
> situation.  This being the case, I might recommend you use gcore to get a
> core of the running memcached process(es) so you'll have something point in
> time stable you can later use a debugger to get the data out of.
>
> If I misunderstand and you're looking to do this on a regular basis or as
> part of some recovery plan for your database, please give us some more info
> on what you want your app to do and we may be able to help point you to a
> solution that doesn't require getting to all of the items in the cache.
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> - Matt
>

Reply via email to