The syntax differences don't lend themselves to being swapped out that
easily. Unless you are going to do a full code roll out to one set of
servers and not another, I don't think this is too easy.
They have different compression settings and I am not sure if they set
the same flag when sending compressed data. I have not had a reason to
look into it.
A simple test would tell you for sure. Just try it out on your test
systems and see how it works. Report back.
Brian.
--------
http://brian.moonspot.net/
On 2/1/10 11:51 PM, Jay Paroline wrote:
Hi all,
We're in the process of switching from the pecl memcache extension to
the pecl memcached extension, but we would like to start out by doing
a very limited rollout of the memcached extension so we can compare
performance and make sure everything is working as expected.
The documentation about the hashing/failover strategies used by the
memcache extension is extremely limited. Does anyone know which
settings I should use for so that pecl/memcache and pecl/memcached
choose the same servers for each key? Should it be considered
generally safe to have both clients working on the same keys?
Thanks,
Jay
