Yeah, I plan to warn them about pecl/memcache. I am in the process of
moving off of it right now.
I was just going include a line like this at the end of my client list.
* Plus MySQL UDF, .NET, C#, Erlang, Lua, and more
So, I just wanted to hit the languages most likely in use by attendees
at the MySQL conference.
Brian.
--------
http://brian.moonspot.net/
On 2/6/10 3:46 AM, Henrik Schröder wrote:
I would suggest Dustin's SpyMemcached for Java.
For C#/.Net I'm going to shamelessly plug my own: BeITMemcached. Google
Analytics says it's very popular in China! :-D
Honestly though, I have no idea which one is more popular, my client or
the Enyim one. I definitely hope noone uses the old java port though. On
the other hand, the total amount of C# users are probably much, much
smaller than the amount of PHP or Perl users so I don't know how
meaningful it is to pick one. Also, the PHP situation is more like that
you want to warn people about using PECL/Memcache because it's not
feature-complete, right? For the other languages, I'm pretty sure there
are several feature-complete clients that have good performance, so the
need to pick a favourite shouldn't be as strong.
TL;DR - Pick me! Pick me!
/Henrik
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 06:59, Brian Moon <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I am working on modifying my memcached presentation for MySQL
conference. It was previously slanted toward PHP for PHP
conferences. I am hoping to make it more general and wanted to know
which clients are preferred for the different languages out there.
I have:
C/C++ - libmemcached
PHP - PECL/memcached
Perl - Cache::Memcache
Need:
Python ?
Java ?
Ruby ?
Thanks!
--
Brian.
--------
http://brian.moonspot.net/
