On Feb 10, 2:37 pm, Jeremy Dunck <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm looking for a .Net client that's actively maintained, preferably
> with noreply support.
What is your goal with noreply?
If you're having a performance problem you hope to solve with it,
you're better off with binary protocol and quiet commands -- this will
make it possible to be aware of and understand failures. You can read
about how I used this technique to improve performance here:
http://dustin.github.com/2009/09/23/spymemcached-optimizations.html
It doesn't specifically describe the semantic problems with
noreply, but you can infer the difference.
