On Feb 17, 1:03 pm, Mathew Hennessy <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > Any chance of TCPWrapper support?
Wow, haven't heard of that in a while. :) > I've been looking thru what I can > find in SASL, but from what I see there's no official support for the > php module, and TCPWrapper would be client-agnostic (coarse allow/deny > based on IP). We should get the clients fixed. The underlying C library has support, so it shouldn't be a big issue. > Use case: shared provider with private IPs but scoped so that other > customers could easily nmap 10.X.X.X for port 11211, then play games > with our keys.. tcpwrappers kind of died off when every OS started shipping firewall kits that can do the same job *far* more efficiently. Is that not an alternative for you?
