Yeah, memcached can do hundreds of writes per seconds, so I wouldn't sweat it.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Marc Bollinger <[email protected]>wrote: > If the scale is actually only hundreds per minute, even sequentially, > I wouldn't worry about memcached writes being the bottleneck, even on > a small machine. > > -- > Marc Bollinger > [email protected] > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:08 AM, mnenchev <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have mdb - message driven bean, that process hundreds messages per > > minute. I want to update memcache on every message - this is very > > frequently. But if i make my mdb singleton it will process messages > > sequentially, so the next update will be done when the previous is > > finished. Is this a problem? > > Regards. > > > -- awl
