No, it's a cache, not a storage solution. When you put things in memcache you are not guaranteed to be able to retrieve them again.
/Henrik On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 07:23, Sreejith S <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi.. > Thnk u for ur reply... > let me explain my scenario > On a sample set od 1000 documents i am generating a matrix of (may be) > 1000000 * 1000 .I have much larger document set than this say 50000. > So can memcahe be able to store these huge matrix representation as u > said?? > > Sreejith > > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:56 AM, PlumbersStock.com < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> When dealing with large data sets I sometimes split it into parts that >> will fit with a master object that stores how many parts it should >> have. Of course it could still fall out of cache but it's no worse >> than if it was one large object that fell out of cache and possible >> better if you kept a primary copy somewhere so you only have to grab >> the missing chunks from it. >> >> big_object: 5 >> big_object_0: data >> big_object_1: data >> big_object_2: data >> big_object_3: data >> big_object_4: data > > >
