since all (php, ruby, c and many others) client library are compatible with memcached, a new function in memcache will be faster reported to client libraries =), that´s why i want it at memcached, not at repcache or membase or memcachedb or anyother it´s a client and server change, it´s not just server change(repcache, membase, memcachedb) now you know why i´m so persistent? =) - client libraries changes are welcome if server side changes exists
2011/2/4 Marc Bollinger <[email protected]>: > I get why you may strike out on your own and write an extension to memcached > that does exactly what you want (kind of, there _are_ better tools, as > mentioned), > that's precisely what open source is about. I do not get why you're so > persistent > about getting changes that the community and maintainers have said several > times > is not the direction memcached is headed committed to the trunk. As Dustin > just > said, write your own engine. Put it on Github, show it off here, > publicize it, write > blogs about it, that's totally great! What's wrong with that? > > - Marc > > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Roberto Spadim <[email protected]> wrote: >> i can´t replace PIC, i have more 2.000 unit of PIC here (a lot of >> money), after that i can use arm with linux >> for now i can just use PIC >> ok, no help from forum, i will try to code by my self, if code looks >> good could i send to memcache mail list and try to make it 'default' >> in source code? >> >> >> 2011/2/4 Dustin <[email protected]>: >>> >>> On Feb 4, 8:37 am, Roberto Spadim <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> put at main memcache code, and we can port to others memcache forks, >>>> got the quest? >>> >>> Our goals are quite far from this. It would be trivial for you to >>> create an extension in the new engine branch to add lock support if >>> you feel it solves your exact problem. You can do this today (right >>> now!) without even reading the server code. It can be misuse of >>> memcached, but it can be misused of memcached contained within your >>> environment. >>> >>>> easy? with it i can have 3 or more send/receive removed from my >>>> pic18f4550 code (save a lot of rom for me) >>> >>> Are you sure you're not looking for a job server (gearmand, >>> beanstalkd, etc...)? Perhaps your mistake is in doing any of the >>> processing on your PIC. >> >> >> >> -- >> Roberto Spadim >> Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial >> > -- Roberto Spadim Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial
